This blog is social website to create awarness on causes, issues and information on subject. This is not a business site and not in providing any kind of commercial services. if you find any content objectable, kindly report on following emailConnect to me by following this blog. You can personally email me on bombaysexlife@gmail.com



Sunday, February 14, 2010

Very happy valentine day........


Wishing you and your dear one a very happy valentine day.....

May you have a great time with your loved one.....

Thursday, February 4, 2010

One more fake matrimonial show on TV, Rahul ka swamwar




Rahul ka swamwar is current matrimonial show on TV after flop shows of Rakhi Ka swamwar, Perfect Bride. In this show 16 girls are trying to win Rahul as their life partner. If you these girls they don't look very beautiful and attractive even after too much make up.
Most of the girls are very young between 19-22 yrs and are looking their careers in glamorous bollywood industry as Model or actress. Normally in today's world even a normal girls don't look for wedding at this age then how these professional girls got excited, simply that is the easiest way to gain popularity on small screen and toRahul ka swamwar get opportunity to enter in bollywood industry. I don't think most of these girls have come for wedding in this show.
How a girl can ready to be chosen by man among 16 girls?
Such kind of matrimonial shows are not really to make couple I don't any marriage done by such show in past have been successful. Choosing a life partner is important decision of someones life and is very personal, which cannot happen on stage in front of million people.



Thursday, January 28, 2010

An other rape with foreign tourist

A 9 year old Russian girl tourist is raped at Goa beach by an unidentified Indian,
which is a shameful instance for our country.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Legalise prostitution if you can't curb it: SC to Centre


New Delhi In a significant remark, the Supreme Court asked the Centre whether it can legalise prostitution if it is not practically possible to curb the world's oldest profession with punitive measures.


"When you say it is the world's oldest profession and when you are not able to curb it by laws, why don't you legalise it? You can then monitor the trade, rehabilitate and provide of medical aid to those involved in the trade," a bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and A K Patnaik told Solicitor General Gopal Subramaniam.
The apex court said legalising sex trade would be a better option to avoid trafficking of women and said nowhere in the world has the trade been curbed by punitive measures.
"They (sex trade) have been operating in one way or the other and nowhere in the world have they been able to curb it by legislation. In some cases, they are carried out in a sophisticated manner. So why don't you legalise it?" the apex court said, to which the Solicitor General said he would look into it.
The apex court's remarks came while dealing with a PIL filed by an NGO Bachpan Bachao Andolan and the intervention application moved by Childline complaining about large scale child trafficking in the country.

source - expressindia.com

No internet sex please, we're Indian. Web firms observe new law

It may have given the world the Kama Sutra and the Bollywood wet sari scene, but it appears that India is not yet ready to be exposed to the delicate subject of sex on the internet.

A Guardian investigation has discovered that several internet companies have quietly introduced filters to prevent Indian users from accessing sexual content.

The Yahoo search engine and Flickr photo-sharing site (owned by Yahoo) altered their sites earlier this month to prevent users in India from switching off the safe-search facility. The block also applies to users in Singapore, Hong Kong and Korea.

Microsoft has also barred Indian users of its Bing search engine from searching for sexual content. Users who do try to search for sexual material receive a notice informing them that "your country or region requires a strict Bing SafeSearch setting, which filters out results that might return adult content".

The clampdown is understood to be in response to recent changes to India's Information Technology Act of 2000, which bans the publication of pornographic material.

That law, which is based on a 150-year-old statute (section 292 of the Indian penal code), defines obscenity as "any content that is lascivious and that will appeal to prurient interest or the effect of which is to tend to deprave or corrupt the minds of those who are likely to see, read or hear the same".

In October, the scope of the 2000 act was dramatically widened to enable action to be taken against a wide range of providers, from internet search engines and internet service providers to cyber-cafes. Under the new law, they are obliged to exercise due diligence and disable access to any content which contravenes the act. Failure to do so carries a three-year jail sentence and a fine of up to 500,000 rupees (£6,690).

Search engine reports suggest that users in India are responsible for more searches for "sex" than those in any other country. Its popular daily newspapers are packed with pictures of young women in states of undress and Bollywood oozes sexuality from every pore.

But at the same time it remains a deeply religious country in which traditionalists regularly take violent offence at anything deemed to be too suggestive.

The latest attempts to constrain internet users come at a time when the vexed subject of sexual behaviour is once again dominating the domestic headlines.

Last week an Indian news channel broadcast video footage of a man said to be the 86-year-old governor of Andhra Pradesh, Narayan Datt Tiwari, in bed with three young women. He quit on Sunday, citing health reasons and still denying that the man in the video was him.

Today there was also mixed news for the tens of thousands of fans of India's most popular – and only – cartoon porn star, Savita Bhabhi.

The sexual antics of the energetic housewife won her website a daily audience of nearly 200,000 visitors, until it was closed down by the Indian government in June.

Now the site is back at a new web address but already it has fallen foul of the Internet Service Providers Association of India, whose president, Rajesh Chharia, warned that it faced closure again because its content was "not acceptable to our culture".

No one from Yahoo was available for comment today but a posting on the Flickr website explained that "Flickr is a global community made up of many different kinds of people.

"What's OK in your backyard may not be OK in theirs. Each one of us bears the responsibility of categorising our own content within this landscape. So, we've introduced some filters to help everyone try to get along.

"If your Yahoo! ID is based in Singapore, Hong Kong, India or Korea you will only be able to view safe content based on your local terms of service (this means you won't be able to turn SafeSearch off)."

source - http://www.guardian.co.uk

Thursday, July 30, 2009

C-grade movie actresses now on small screen


Now you can watch C-grade C grade movie’s sultry actress showing on your home screen.
Now Negar Khan had joined as one of the contestant on new reality show Iss Jungle Se Mujhe Bachao.
Some days back Shweta Tiwari and other girl were providing bathing scene on your screen and now recently Negar Khan took bath in bikini and started exposing scenes which used to be available on 3rd grade cinema.

It’s very good news for all as all such stuff now easily available for our kids at home only. Soon we should be able to watch XX and XXX scenes on our screen along with our family.





Many such snaps are available on internet of her, just to respect viewer I have edited to hide some area in the picture
A pornographic action by her

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Sach ka samana – A New concept of reality TV show


Recently I watched few episodes of new TV show Sach ka samana. It looks very new reality TV show concept in India. Here participant has to give true answer of every question, which is very personal. To know truthfulness of the answer polygraph machine is used. Here I am not going to discuss detail and rule of this show as I assume most of us have watched its episode. No doubt concept is new and good but here I have some confusion. I watched very first episode of this show where a married female was participant I really don’t remember her name but what I can collect she was around few years married with two kids having complete family life. I was observing the question she was being asked and very surprised as she was accepting the painful truth for most of the question. She had almost won Rs 5 lacs after giving around 11 truths, she was continuing and questions were getting more & more personal. But I realized most of the questions were based on personal feeling and thinking, which I felt is not fair. Like female was asked question like

* Do you feel that someone else looks better than your husband?

* Do you feel your mother loves your brother more than you?

* Did you ever felt to kill your husband?

If you ask me, I feel that they are just pathetic questions and originally have no specific or correct answer. As feeling or thinking is unintentional process in human brain and most of the time is not logical, even has no value/effect. If you try to compare following two questions you might understand what I am trying to say.

1. If you ask a person Other than your wife did you ever had sex with some girl?

2. Other than your wife did you ever feel to have sex with some girl?

If you see here first question is very much relevant and person answering will be very much clear as what is the truth, while second question is very confusing for any one as no-one even remembers that what he felt just 5 minutes before and if he felt something as such what was the intensity of such feeling, if intensity is very low than really such feeling doesn’t have any value and impact on individual’s character, moral or personality. What I understand from this show, they ask most of the time question based on feeling or thinking and try to confuse the person as no body can actually proof what he felt or not. I was shocked when this female was asked the question as other than your husband did you felt about other man, first it needs to be clearly defined if someone felt then actually on what extends. Even it is possible with most of us when we watch some beautiful actress in movie doing some bold scene and for a second it comes in mind WOW, a feeling for moment and it goes, then if it has to be blamed as I felt for that girl, I don’t think this is fare at all.

If this show really has to succeed, I think they will have to go towards event based questions, which have clear answers and what people actually want to know.

Source - deepak.thaper@gmail.com